Building an AI-ready workforce: the roles of ethical leadership, knowledge integration, and organizational adaptability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67224/ioasdjbms.2024.v01i04.008Keywords:
Artificial intelligence workforce readiness; Ethical leadership; Knowledge integration; Organizational adaptability; Human capital investment; Entrepreneurial organizationsAbstract
Purpose: This study examines how human capital investment contributes to organizational adaptability through AI workforce readiness and knowledge integration while investigating the moderating role of ethical leadership in entrepreneurial and innovation-oriented organizations. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative survey was conducted among employees working in AI-enabled organizations across Canada. Data were collected from 381 respondents employed in startups, small and medium-sized enterprises, and innovation-focused business units. The proposed model was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4. Findings: The findings indicate that human capital investment positively influences AI workforce readiness, which subsequently enhances knowledge integration and organizational adaptability. Knowledge integration partially mediates the relationship between AI workforce readiness and organizational adaptability. Ethical leadership strengthens the relationship between AI workforce readiness and knowledge integration, although its moderating effect on the relationship between knowledge integration and organizational adaptability was not significant. The results suggest that organizational adaptability in AI-enabled environments depends on the interaction of workforce capabilities, knowledge-sharing processes, and ethical leadership practices. Originality/value: This study extends Human Capital Theory, Organizational Learning Theory, and Ethical Leadership Theory by introducing AI workforce readiness as a distinct organizational capability linking human capital investments to adaptive outcomes. The study also provides new insights into how ethical leadership supports responsible AI adoption and knowledge integration within entrepreneurial and innovation-oriented organizations.
References
• Acharya, C., Ojha, D., Gokhale, R., & Patel, P. C. (2022). Managing information for innovation using knowledge integration capability: The role of boundary spanning objects. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102438
• Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377701400320
• Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• Frick, N. R., Mirbabaie, M., Stieglitz, S., & Salomon, J. (2021). Maneuvering through the stormy seas of digital transformation: The impact of empowering leadership on the AI readiness of enterprises. Journal of Decision Systems, 30(2–3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2021.1888398
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
• Guo, Y., Chen, Y., Usai, A., Wu, L., & Qin, W. (2023). Knowledge integration for resilience among multinational SMEs amid the COVID-19: From the view of global digital platforms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2021-0719
• Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human–AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Business Horizons, 61(4), 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007
• Jöhnk, J., Weißert, M., & Wyrtki, K. (2021). Ready or not, AI comes—An interview study of organizational AI readiness factors. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 63(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-020-00676-7
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJeC.2015100101
• Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022). To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organization Science, 33(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547
• Mäntymäki, M., Minkkinen, M., Birkstedt, T., & Viljanen, M. (2022). Defining organizational AI governance. AI and Ethics, 2(4), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00108-6
• Mikalef, P., Islam, N., Parida, V., Singh, H., & Altwaijry, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) competencies for organizational performance: A B2B marketing capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113998
• Misuraca, G., & Viscusi, G. (2020). AI-enabled innovation in the public sector: A framework for digital governance and resilience. In International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 110–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_9
• Mökander, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics-based auditing of automated decision-making systems: Nature, scope, and limitations. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(4), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00319-4
• Mowles, C. (2015). Managing in uncertainty: Complexity and the paradoxes of everyday organizational life. Routledge.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189
• Simpson, P. A., Greller, M. M., & Stroh, L. K. (2002). Variations in human capital investment activity by age. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1847
• Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021). How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. Journal of Business Research, 134, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009
• Sousa, M. J. (2013). Knowledge integration in problem solving processes. In Á. Rocha, A. M. Correia, T. Wilson, K. A. Stroetmann, & M. Z. G. Alves (Eds.), Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 289–299). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36981-0_28
• Strober, M. H. (1990). Human capital theory: Implications for HR managers. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 29(2), 214–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1990.tb00752.x
• Sweetland, S. R. (1996). Human capital theory: Foundations of a field of inquiry. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066003341
• Uren, V., & Edwards, J. S. (2023). Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102588.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Meisam Karami (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The IOASD Journal of Business and Management Studies publishes all articles under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Under this license, readers are free to copy, distribute, share, adapt, and reproduce the published work in any medium or format for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source.
